Mozart's violin

by Dmitry Badiarov

Two sound ideals

Mozart violin - construction of violins, violas and cellos at Mozart's time was different from what it is today. Most important was the difference in sound. Actually, there were two sound ideals: one was called "human voice" and another "silvery ". The first was considered the most appropriate for a concert violin, the second for an orchestral violin.

Sound ideals between middle of 18th century and till ca.1826

Existence of two kinds of violins is apparent from Wolfgang's letter to Leopold, which he wrote on the 6th October, 1777: "…when they [Dubreill - pupil of Tartini, and Carl - his youngest son] began to discuss violins for concerts and violins for orchestras, they reasoned very well, and they were always of the same opinion as I". Five years later, when Mozart was 26, in 1782, Paduan luthier Antonio Bagatella published a violinmaking treatise - "Memoir, or Rules for the construction of violins - violas - violoncellos - double basses". He instructed on how to obtain a "silvery voice" or a "human voice". Connoisseur of Mozart P.Lichtenthal mentioned two sound ideals of Mozart's time in his "Dictionary of Music", published in 1826. From the above documents it is apparent that two kinds of violins existed during a few decades, and it was still remembered in the beginning of the 19th century.

Beginning of transformations

Bagatella was one of the first and the most famous luthiers who made transformations of the old baroque violins into "classical" instruments. "I adapted proportions of many old violins, working more on old instruments than on instruments which I made myself". According to his Memoirs, he started making violins when he was about 19. On Christmas night, 1748, he discovered the rules, which became his method. This was probably the time, when the first violin modifications of "classical" character took place. It was just before Tartini and Geminiani published their treatises on violin playing (1750 and 1751 respectively). A few years later, in 1756, Leopold Mozart published his treatise. Same year Wolfgang Mozart was born.

fig. 1. Small violin - original neck and other original parts are lost. It is furnished with
modern fingerboard, tailpiece, and bridge

fig. 2. Viola and violin. Viola has lost its original size. Its original neck and fingerboard are modified in the end of the 18th or beginning of the 19th century. The violin has an original neck and an old fingerboard, however the neck is thinned. Attribution of all three instruments to Mozart's ex-property is too vague to be taken seriously. mozart violin

Method

The method of Bagatella is a proportional design, in which all violin parts assembled together in a perfect Harmony. He believed that things were not in harmony at HIS time, but they were in harmony in the past and he “discovered” the rules. Thus, to obtain a "human voice" the top of an instrument must have an even thickness. To obtain a "silvery voice" the top must be somewhat thicker in the middle. So when Bagatella was demanded to create a "human voice" he had to make the thickness of the top equal. When a "silvery voice" was demanded - the top had to be left thicker in the middle, and made thinner toward the ribs. In both cases both outline and thicknesses were changed proportionally.

Unknown criteria

We can't know how they distinguished between "human" and "silvery" voices. Many of the “Strads” and other instruments had the tops with an equal thickness. Probably the sound of such instruments was called "human". Guarneri violin, which was in a possession of Paganini, has a top thicker in the middle. Was it called "silvery" at Bagatella's time? Was it called "silvery" even in Paganini's hands? This may remain a question forever - one certain thing is that it was a concert violin for him.

Tartini, Bagatella and Mozart

In 1782, when Bagatella was 49, he was a famous man. He wrote: "I had the opportunity to work for Mr. Tartini over the course of approximately thirty years, working both on his own violins as well as those of his students. He had numerous pupils who were sent by Princes from all over Europe". "I reduced many [violins - D.B.] upon request for Giuseppe Tartini", and "many others were made to order for Mr. Tartini and I have no idea where he sent them to". Tartini was a famous motivator of the new sound esthetics. Mozart probably heard of Bagatella. It is unlikely that Mr. Dubreill should not have mentioned Bagatella, when Wolfgang discussed violins with him. Bagatella lists dozens of customer names in the Memoir. Although there are no Mozarts, it is possible that Leopold could be among them: "There are many foreigners, whose names I do not remember".

Mozart’s instruments

Leopold, who took the greatest care about musical education of Wolfgang, furnished him with a few instruments. Originally "baroque", these instruments were modernized in the 2nd half of the 18th century. This is the list of instruments, preserved in the Mozart Museum in Salzburg:

Attribution and lack of evidence

The problem with all these instruments is that there is not enough evidence to assume that these instruments indeed were in Mozart’s property. Apart from the above instruments, there are a few instruments of doubtful property and attribution preserved in different collections in Europe.

Illustrations by courtesy of Prof. Marco Tiella


Dmitry Badiarov started instrument making at an age of 12 (as well as playing the violin) in Russia. His violinmaking teachers were Vladimir Oiberman, Vladimir Yakimenko (Russia), and Luca Primon (Italy). Violin playing teachers were professors Semyon Ziskind, Mark Komissarov (modern violin, Russia) and Sigiswald Kuijken (baroque violin, Belgium). After having graduated two conservatories (in St.Petersburg - modern violin, and Brussels - baroque violin) he established a violin-and-bow-making atelier of his own in Brussels. Apart from making instruments Dmitry Badiarov writes and publishes articles on historical violin.

Visit Badiarov's web site at: http://www.violadabraccio.com/